Jewellers celebrate as plan for theme bar at scene of Hatton Garden heist is abandoned

One of oldest businesses in diamond district faced being forced to move

Thursday, 12th November — By Tom Foot

the vault

The vault was due to be one of the centre pieces of the attraction

A DEVELOPER has abandoned a plan to open a Hatton Garden heist-themed wine bar following a diamond district backlash.

Hatton Garden Properties has written to the Town Hall saying it had “regretfully taken the decision to withdraw” its plans to transform the former site of the infamous 2015 safe deposit box hole-in-the-wall robbery.

Planning officers had made it clear they would not recommend the application for approval due to planning policies, the letter said.

The New Journal had reported in August how the longest-serving jewellery retailer, George Katz, was being forced out of a shop his father set up 70 years ago after fleeing the Nazis with little more than a string of gems which his mother had sewn into his suit for safe keeping.

Dozens of Hatton Garden traders had objected to the plans, arguing it would make a mockery of the trauma caused by the robbery.

On Tuesday, Robert Willis, George’s son-in-law and director at E Katz & Co, told the New Journal: “The campaign that we ran wasn’t particularly planned. It just happened. We tried everything we could but we didn’t imagine it would get going like it did. But the whole point of it is to secure the legacy of the shop.

“We don’t know what is going to happen next but we are now very positive. There is genuinely no ill-will toward the landlord from our point of view. We are all grown-ups. We want to move forward in a positive way and we want to stay here for as long as possible.”

He added: “When the story came out I went down to the library to get a big bundle of CNJs, and put them up in the lobby. They were all gone by the afternoon. It was really important all that I think.”

More than £14 million worth of precious metals, cash and jewels was stolen by thieves who drilled through the wall of the shop beneath E Katz & Co in 2015.

Robert Willis and George Katz

The case made headlines around the world not simply for the audacity of the crime – which would not seem out of place in a Hollywood action movie – but the age of the thieves involved, many of whom were seasoned crooks over the age of 60.

Sir Michael Caine and Sir Jim Broadbent were among the cast of King of Thieves, one of several crime capers and heist films inspired by the story.

In August, Mr Willis’ father-in-law George told the New Journal: “To my mind it is like when you have a car crash and there are people slowing down to look at it and see if there are any bodies there. It is ghoulish and completely inappropriate … A lot of people lost their livelihoods in the robbery.”

A string of businesses had backed the Katz family in the row saying a “change of use” of the jewellery shop to a bar could be the beginning of the end of Hatton Garden.

The developer had argued that the landlord, Pearl and Coutts, had made several attempts to market the space to other jewellery companies and the new bar would be a destination for tourists.

But in the end the council ruled that a change of use from jewellery business to bar use would not be accepted by the council.

The letter from the applicant said: “The lawful planning position confirms that the existing accommodation (excluding the Vault area) is not restricted to jewellery-related uses and could be occupied for a range of alternative Class E uses, including a gym, café, restaurant, medical, or professional services use, without the need to obtain planning permission from the Council for any such change of use.

“Whilst it remains the applicant’s view that this lawful fallback position constitutes a material consideration which should be afforded significant weight in the determination of the application, it is understood that the Council does not consider it sufficient to outweigh the requirements of Local Plan Policy E2 in the overall planning balance.

“In light of the council’s position, the applicant has regretfully taken the decision to withdraw planning application.”

Related Articles