|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| UPDATED
EVERY THURSDAY
Last Update: Friday
19th November 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All
content © New Journal Enterprises, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Heath ponds: closure threat
|
SWEEPING proposals to reduce the cost of running Hampstead Heath
including the closure of its historic swimming ponds have sparked
outrage amongst user groups.
The Corporation of London, managers of the 900-acre Heath, say that
urgent cost-cutting measures are needed to address an overspend in
the £5.5m budget and prevent a further cash crisis next
year.
Catherine McGuiness, CoL director in charge of the Heath, said: We
have seen this situation developing over the last two years. In previous
years we were able to squeeze funds from other headings but now we
have a strong understanding of how the budgets are working.
We now have no choice but to look carefully at priorities
how we can achieve the best possible balance for users on the Heath?
We might also have to look at a further tightening of the belt in
the future to keep costs down.
But the proposals, which include the introduction of charges for using
Parliament Hill Lido before 9am a time when the Lido has been
free to swimmers and the possible closure of either one or
all of the Heaths ponds, have outraged user groups and staff.
Robert Sutherland Smith, chair of the United Swimmers Association,
accused the CoL of a grandiose management style which had caused the
spiralling costs.
He said: To blame an overrun of some £250,000 on the weather,
as they do, is simply unbelievable.
Closer to the true explanation is the fact that the heath now
suddenly has a bigger, more generously paid bureaucracy.
Why should Londons citizens be expected to pay the cost
of wanton expenditure and neglect by Corporation officers?
Heath managers say that they are confident they are not overstaffed,
after a long over due and thorough restructuring of staff by Superintendent
Simon Lee.
But park keepers told the New Journal they were almost certain to
face sackings, and if staff numbers went down, the careful balance
between the Heaths delicate ecology and being open to all would
be threatened. One park keeper, who did not want to be named, said:
We cant believe the figures. Weve been told its
to do with the poor performance of their stocks and shares, but the
Corporation is so rich we cant believe they arent able
to absorb a hit of this amount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|