UPDATED EVERY
FRIDAY

Last Update:
Friday 23rd December, 2005
 
PUBLICATION
By SUNITA RAPPAI and RICHARD OSLEY
 
ISLINGTON
WEST END EXTRA
 
SECTIONS
MUSIC - CLASSICAL
MUSIC - GROOVES
THEATRE
RESTAURANTS
HEALTH
 
NAVIGATION


With Google
 
 
 
Tangled and tragic tale that ended in a brutal axe killing

Near decapitation shocked neighbours – we uncover the full sad 20-year story


Brian Messitt


Flowers left at the murder scene in March

BRIAN Messitt was struck down by an axe on a leafy Belsize Park Street in March in an horrific murder which shocked neighbours and left the pensioner’s family devastated.
It was a seemingly motiveless attack that, prosecutors were at a loss to explain.
Asked at the scene why he did it, the killer, Joseph Sheehan casually replied: “I’ve known him for 20 years, it’s complicated.”
This week, as Sheehan appeared for the 16th time at the Old Bailey where once again sentencing was delayed while doctors reports are prepared, the New Journal has learned of a complicated, disturbing and tragic story which links killer and victim over a period of 20 years.
We can reveal that while lawyers have been at a loss to establish a strong link between the two men, they had in fact known each other for years. Messitt, the victim, was close friends with Sheehan’s foster father, who killed himself in 1989 while being investigated over allegations of child abuse.
Sheehan, the killer, pleaded guilty to manslaughter due to diminished responsibility in August. He is remanded in Broadmoor psychiatric hospital.
Crown prosecutors admitted again yesterday (Wednesday) they were still baffled by the motive for the grisly killing, which left Mr Messitt, 67, nearly decapitated in Eton Avenue, Swiss Cottage.
The New Journal has learned that Sheehan, at one time, lived just four doors away from Mr Messitt’s Haverstock Hill home – and was seen with Mr Messitt several times by a neighbour.
Mr Messitt was also a regular visitor to the home of Sheehan’s foster father, Michael Riley, of Haverstock Hill.
Sheehan was fostered by Mr Riley in the early 1980s and stayed with him in his Haverstock hill home until 1985, when he turned 18.
In 1989 the New Journal published a report of the inquest into Mr Riley’s death. The report revealed Mr Riley – who had fostered several young children – was found slumped in the corner of his flat in Haverstock Hill by Brian Messitt.
Our article told how Messitt spoke at an inquest at St Pancras Coroner’s Court during which he made specific reference to a police inquiry into allegations that Mr Riley had abused children.
A neighbour of Riley, who did not want to be named, told the New Journal yesterday (Wednesday) that Mr Messitt had been well known to children fostered by Mr Riley.
Both Mr Messitt and Sheehan had also been regular visitors to her flat until three years ago.
The neighbour said: “Brian had been very close to Mike. He was at his flat virtually every day and all Mike’s foster kids knew him. After Mike died, Brian would come and visit me and Joe came round often as well.
“Sometimes they would both be in the flat together. You could tell from their body language that Joe and Brian were more than just friends. On one occasion, not long after Mike died, I remember that Joe got very angry with Brian and said he hadn’t done enough to protect the children.”
According to the source, Sheehan lost contact with Mr Messitt after the latter’s frequent travels to India. But Sheehan continued to keep in touch with his former Haverstock Hill neighbours – although he rarely mentioned Mr Messitt.
She said: “He had a lot of problems. He was very quiet, he couldn’t really get on with people. I think the other kids had bullied him – he was incredibly damaged. I felt sorry for him. He used to talk about Mike and how much he hated him but he never mentioned Brian.
“The council let all these kids down. They were just a bunch of kids that no one wanted. Mike seemed nice on the surface but he had a dark side. He shouted at the kids a lot and I think he abused them.
“Brian was much nicer. He was very laid back and very gentle. Their friendship was bizarre because he and Mike were so different. I think Joe couldn’t get Mike back for what he had done and he took it out against the closest person to him.”
 

   
   
 
All content © New Journal Enterprises, 2005