UPDATED EVERY
FRIDAY

Last Update:
Friday 9th December, 2005
 
PUBLICATION
FORUM - Opinion in the CNJ
 
ISLINGTON
WEST END EXTRA
 
SECTIONS
MUSIC - CLASSICAL
MUSIC - GROOVES
THEATRE
RESTAURANTS
HEALTH
 
NAVIGATION


With Google
 
 
 
ULU plan will sever community links

Student union leader Samuel Thomas argues that plans to reorganise London’s colleges will ruin community relations


UCL’s Senate House


Samuel Thomas

READING the media in the last week, you can hardly have avoided the frenzy of guesswork about the future of the University of London. You might wonder what all the fuss is about. You wouldn’t be the only ones.
Several people have called for the university – a federation of 23 colleges – to be dissolved. They generally call for the large colleges to become independent universities, and simply take over the small and medium-sized colleges.
The arguments offered are as varied as they are unconvincing. They range from political and commercial ambition to spurious attacks on the academic standards of certain colleges.
The University of London Union (ULU) is independent and I have no brief to defend the university. I work to promote the needs of students. But neither the interests of students nor the concerns of the community play much part in the arguments of those who call for dissolution.
One of the most incredible of such arguments was made by Simon Jenkins in The Guardian last week. He chose to attack the university by insulting Bloomsbury. While the university has colleges as far afield as Paris and western Scotland, and in all parts of London, many of them are concentrated in Bloomsbury. Mr Jenkins calls the area a “tarmacked wilderness” and insists that it is “one of the bleakest parts of central London”. He says little about the wonderfully diverse people who choose to live, work and study here.
The advantages of Bloomsbury were driven home to me recently when I visited a university in the midlands. I found a place in which students are in a state of permanent warfare with the community. The totally enclosed campus meant that thousands of students can access virtually any service – shops, cinema, doctor, bars – without ever seeing a resident. In turn, the residents resent the students and blame them for a number of problems. Hostility builds up between the two groups who can easily judge each other because they rarely meet.
In contrast, within minutes of leaving my office I can be chatting with residents of Tavistock Square or shop assistants on the Tottenham Court Road. People who live or work in Bloomsbury find themselves rubbing shoulders with students. Londoners with no other connection with higher education visit the excellent gym and swimming pool. In Bloomsbury, relations between students and locals are a cause for celebration and pride.
I am constantly looking for ways to build on this and form greater partnerships with the community. When I addressed the Bloomsbury Association on Tuesday I made it clear that suggestions and comments from locals were positively desirable.
But relations between students and residents would be greatly threatened if the university was dissolved. ULU represents students not only to the government and the media but also to representatives of the area, such as councillors and residents’ associations. Positive relationships have been built up over years, and without ULU here we would simply be sent back to the drawing board of community relations. Following my recent experience in the midlands, it’s not a drawing board I’m very keen to sit at.
Residents would find themselves no longer able to use ULU’s swimming pool or visit the gigs we host.
If, as Simon Jenkins suggests, our buildings were knocked down, then community groups from Bloomsbury and Camden would lose the meeting and conference facilities that ULU provides.
Losses to students would include facilities such as accommodation and careers advice, provided efficiently and cheaply at a university-wide level. The small colleges, such as the School of Oriental and African Studies, would be unable to exist completely alone and simply become departments of larger institutions, with far less independence than they currently enjoy. They would lose their identities and quite possibly their international reputations. Students would no longer benefit from ULU’s campaigning, which in recent years has won a 30 per cent student discount on London’s public transport.
Cynical stereotypes of students present us all as disruptive nuisances. Bloomsbury has exposed this image as a falsehood. ULU and the University of London will continue to benefit the community. Let’s treat Simon Jenkins’ insults with the contempt they deserve. Let’s continue to work together for Bloomsbury.

• Samuel Thomas is acting president of the University of London Union
 



Paris is still No.1 in the wine world


PARIS, sera toujours Paris, sang the French singer and Hollywood star of the 1940s Maurice Chevalier.
FULL STORY





Give our school kids a sporting chance

DON’T know about you but I hated sport at school. It was all that prancing around in your knickers...
FULL STORY
   
   
 
All content © New Journal Enterprises, 2005