UPDATED EVERY
FRIDAY

Last Update:
Friday 2nd December, 2005
 
PUBLICATION
By KIM JANSSEN
 
ISLINGTON
WEST END EXTRA
 
SECTIONS
MUSIC - CLASSICAL
MUSIC - GROOVES
THEATRE
RESTAURANTS
HEALTH
 
NAVIGATION


With Google
 
 
 
Swimmers’ anger at £45,000 Heath chiefs

‘Too many bosses’ claim as ponds face new cash crisis

HEATH bosses refused to disclose what they and their staff earn this week as anger mounted over revelations that Hampstead’s swimming ponds are again under threat from a financial crisis.
With seven full-time administration staff – thought to include Heath superintendent Simon Lee – earning an average of more than £45,000, and a further 111 full-time ‘operational’ staff earning an average of more than £34,000, swimmers say Heath guardians the Corporation of London should look elsewhere for cuts before closing ponds or sacking lifeguards.
Robert Sutherland-Smith, chairman of the United Swimmers Association, said the “high” average wages suggested there were “too many managers and supervisors”, which he said was bourne out by rank-and-file staff fed-up that “the workforce has become increasing hierarchical”.
The Corporation, which released its overall pay figures in a report on Monday, says the average figures are misleading but refuses to give a more detailed breakdown.
Charging at the ponds, free for more than a century, was controversially introduced this summer amid massive public opposition.
The Corporation said the £500,000-a-year bill for lifeguards and cleaning at the three ponds made it an obvious target for charging or cuts as the cash crisis bit.
But just one in 12 swimmers has paid the £2 charge into honesty boxes since they were installed.
Campaigners have been demanding access to the Corporation’s detailed accounts for nearly two years.
Unlike Camden Council and the Greater London Authority, the Corporation is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and the Audit Commission Act, which require detailed accounts to be disclosed.
Swimmers – many of whom have used the ponds for decades – believe the Heath has been mismanaged by the Corporation and that the accounts are being withheld because they would prove embarrassing.
But a Corporation of London spokeswoman said: “The management of the Heath is not one of the Corporation’s obligatory local authority functions so there is no requirement for us to disclose these figures.
“There have been demands for greater transparency but they have to be considered by the relevant committees.
“The Heath is funded from City cash, which means residents do not have to pay tax on its upkeep.”



Attitudes mature to English wine


WHEN Hugh Johnson published the first edition of his book Wine in 1966, there were three commercial vineyards in England.
FULL STORY





This Heath price hike is just not cricket

THIS summer’s Ashes success didn’t just help us armchair types suss out our full toss from our wrist spin.
FULL STORY
   
   
 
All content © New Journal Enterprises, 2005