UPDATED EVERY
FRIDAY

Last Update:
Friday 7th October, 2005
 
PUBLICATION
By ROISIN GADELRAB
 
ISLINGTON
WEST END EXTRA
 
SECTIONS
MUSIC
THEATRE
RESTAURANTS
HEALTH
 
NAVIGATION


With Google
 
 
 
E-rated Town Hall boss seen as leader’s ‘stooge’

Labour rival claims ‘political patronage bred culture of cynicism’


Former Labour group leader Mary Creagh


Chief executive Helen Bailey

TOWN Hall chief executive Helen Bailey was branded the council leader’s “stooge” at a hearing on Friday into alleged misconduct by five Islington councillors.
Former Labour opposition leader Mary Creagh, the woman behind accusations of “cronyism” at Islington Council, was giving evidence at the hearing brought by government watchdog the Standards Board for England.
She claimed Ms Bailey was appointed to the £130,000-a-year post despite being poorly graded in an independent recruitment assessment.
Ms Bailey scored an E. Mrs Creagh, who sat on the selection panel, said she had never before recalled a candidate with such a low grade being accepted.
Mrs Creagh, now Labour MP for Wakefield in Yorkshire, told the hearing of her disgust at the way the selection process for council chief executive was undermined.
She criticised fellow selection panel members, labelling one a “bully” with a “bad temper” and two others “weak yes women”.
Five councillors, including Town Hall leader Councillor Steve Hitchins, are fighting for their reputations in Britain’s longest-running case of alleged misconduct by councillors. It has now been going on for three years.
Lib Dem councillors Bridget Fox, Dorrie Valery, Margot Dunn and Jyoti Vaja are the others under scrutiny.
It is alleged Ms Bailey’s appointment was “political” and influenced by her close friendship with Cllr Hitchins.
Mrs Creagh told the hearing fellow councillors had favoured internal candidates with lower grades above higher-achieving external applicants.
She said in a statement that panel members pushed for the inclusion of policy consultant Ms Bailey, even though Mrs Creagh believed she did not fit the job specification.
From her conversations with middle and junior managers, Mrs Creagh concluded that Ms Bailey was seen as Cllr Hitchins’ “stooge” and was not highly thought of in terms of what she had delivered in her previous role as policy consultant.
Mrs Creagh described Cllr Hitchins as a “very powerful controlling figure with a bullying style and a bad temper”. She added in her statement: “I believe many staff members are afraid of him.”
Mrs Creagh referred to Cllrs Vaja and Valery as “yes women”, with Cllr Vaja labelled the “weakest” and “least capable” member of the cabinet.
Mrs Creagh described Cllr Fox as “feisty and independent” as well as being a “serious member of the executive”, and Cllr Dunn was considered a “sensible” and “tough-minded” lady.
Mrs Creagh claimed Ms Bailey “was shortlisted because she was a friend of the Liberal Democrat councillors”.
On learning of Ms Bailey’s appointment, she said: “I was furious that I had spent seven hours on a predetermined outcome.
She added: “I consider it actually extremely demotivational for other council employees to see Helen Bailey had been shortlisted. It must surely breed a culture of cynicism about the political patronage within the organisation that would not make chief officers feel motivated or rewarded.”



It’s time for ‘sell by’ dates on wines


TELEVISION chef Rick Stein claimed in The Daily Telegraph in August that “the wine revolution that had swept this country was leaving the French behind,” ....
FULL STORY

A local team for local people

WE all know the lengths football fans will go to to support their team...
FULL STORY

   
   
 
All content © New Journal Enterprises, 2005