UPDATED EVERY
FRIDAY

Last Update:
Friday 23rd September, 2005
 
PUBLICATION
By PETER GRUNER
 
ISLINGTON
WEST END EXTRA
 
SECTIONS
MUSIC
THEATRE
RESTAURANTS
HEALTH
 
NAVIGATION


With Google
 
 
 
Storm over £80k spin doctor

Plans by Islington Council to appoint an £80,000 a year ‘spin doctor’ were branded this week as a “cynical ploy to promote itself” eight months before the local elections.
The borough is advertising for an Assistant Director of Customer Focus to deliver the message that Islington is the “fastest improving council in the country” and one of “London’s most dynamic boroughs”.
The successful applicant would help run the council’s press office but also have the ear of departmental heads to advise on communications and consultation.
Labour opposition leader Councillor Catherine West immediately attacked the appointment as extremely wasteful at a time when the council had been cutting back on services.
“I can think of a number of better things the money could be more profitably spent on instead of another council publicist,” she said. “What about bringing four more council homes up to the Labour government’s Decent Homes Standard. Or a three-person graffiti removal team?
“A decent consultation on the St Mary Magdalene Academy?
“Or better swimming lesson provision across Islington, with three more swimming teachers?
“Above else, the Lib Dems are wedded to their PR. The £80,000 could be better spent on a host of different things, which would directly improve the quality of life for our residents.
“Yet the Lib Dems have opted to spend money telling voters that ‘they’ve never had it so good’.”
Labour, she added, is committed to cutting back the council’s publicity bill, and spending the savings on front line services.
The job was advertised in Saturday’s Guardian media pages under the heading:” The fastest improving council in the country – take us to a higher level.”
King’s Cross residents' action group spokesman Stephan Schulte said:” I’m not questioning what they are paying – the issue is that we have an election coming up next year. Why would they want to promote themselves to the public if it was not for electioneering?
“This is a glorified PR job and the question is why is it necessary at all? Why should we the taxpayers spend any additional money on funding this job?”
Independent Cllr Richard Heseltine said he was surprised the council had to pay £80,000 for the job. “But spin doctors are kings these days. And the idea is possibly to get newspapers like the Islington Tribune on message.
“The advertisement says up o £78,807 but I would have thought that £60,000 was nearer the mark.”
Council leader Cllr Steve Hitchins said that he understood the officer would replace the previous director of communications. “There isn’t an authority in the country who doesn’t have a director of communications or the equivalent. If you read the local Government Association guidelines they say communications and PR are very, very important. At the same time we are advised that £78,000 is about the going rate for the job.”
   
   
 
All content © New Journal Enterprises, 2005