|
A passionate book on the last woman to be
hanged in Britain uncovers some uncomfortable memories for Gerald
Isaaman
Ruth Ellis: My Sisters Secret Life by Muriel Jakubait
Robinson, £8.99
|

Sister: Muriel Jakubait

David Blakely and Ruth Ellis
|
RUTH Ellis shot her errant lover David Blakely outside the
Magdala Tavern, in South Hill Park, Hampstead, on the Easter Bank
Holiday of April 10, 1955, just a week before I began work as
a junior reporter on the Ham and High.
So her sordid story has stayed with me, the saga of the peroxide-blonde-nightclub-hostess-cum-prostitute
as presented by the press was an open and shut case, to which
she had openly pleaded guilty when the police arrived.
The jury at her trial took a mere 23 minutes to convict her and
50 years ago this month Albert Pierrepoint, the public executioner,
put the noose around her neck in Holloway Prison and she
became, notoriously, the last woman to be hanged in Britain.
Outside the jail protesters prayed for her and demanded a reprieve.
Nothing happened. In Hampstead that morning another reporter,
Clive Cullerne-Bown, and I went down to the Magdala and talked
to the regulars about the shocking murder on their doorstep. Clive
wrote a front page piece which had the headline, Sick unto death.
And many since that day have been sick at the thought that Ruth
Ellis was hardly given a chance to live, that not even a plea
of manslaughter or one of diminished responsibility was considered
acceptable.
Perhaps because of her hasty execution many wondered too whether
she was guilty of nothing more than a crime passionnel involving
betrayal, one that resulted in her squeezing the trigger and killing
her racing car-driving lover who had so brutally kicked and beaten
her.
There have been books and films and controversy ever since about
Ruth Ellis, now an icon by those who, a decade later, rapturously
applauded when the Hampstead solicitor and doyen Labour MP Sidney
Silverman fought successfully to outlaw capital punishment.
But was it Ruth Ellis who shot David Blakely? It is a question
that has plagued her sister, Muriel Jakubait, who, although her
brave attempts to get Ruth Ellis pardoned have failed, has now
given the cause of justice being seen to be done fresh impetus.
Her new book, written with the help of Monica Weller, is a sensation.
For she tells an amazingly complex and tangled tale of how Ruth
Ellis was secretly mixed up with espionage, in particular with
the Russian spies Burgess and Maclean, how she was manipulated
by Dr Stephen Ward, the man behind the Profumo/Christine Keeler
scandal that brought down the Macmillan government, and a woman
whose friends included, surprisingly, the Hollywood star Deborah
Kerr.
Jakubait comes to the remarkable conclusion that Ruths former
sugar daddy lover, Desmond Cussen, himself mixed up with security,
certainly involved in dubious dark double dealing, is the real
monster. After all, he gave her the gun with which she allegedly
shot Blakely. But it was Cussen, claims Jakubait, who was the
third man who actually fired the bullets after Ruths
initial attempt that night without any knowledge at all
of how to use a gun totally failed when she lost her nerve.
The whole thing, she dares, was no romantic accident but a murder
plot deliberately organised like a military exercise by those
seeking to stop some great secret being divulged. Ruth Ellis was
the innocent victim of it all. It is a hard and fanciful biscuit
to chew, but then there are so many explosive holes in the Ruth
Ellis story that they inevitably lead you to suspect the simplistic
story of a lovers treachery that ended in two deaths, one
supposedly legal. Indeed, later the police did suspect that Cussen
was the killer yet bizarrely decided it would be an injustice
if he was charged years after Ruth Ellis had paid the sacrifice
on the scaffold.
And the more you read about Jakubaits years of painstaking
research and its implausible and unproven results, the more, instinctively,
you want to believe it to be the real truth. Yet fact and fiction
are indelibly inter-twined, as are the myths of so-called history,
and the final reflection at the end has to be that we shall never
know.
She is too late to make the DNA connections. It is not, inevitably
and unhappily, a good book, because it is so passionate and personal
and because so many members of the lethal cast are themselves
now dead and cannot, even if they were willing, answer vital questions.
This means that Jakubait is forced, in the end, to rely too often
on speculation and a heavy dose of wishful thinking, honest although
it is, to protect her desired memory of Ruth Ellis as a martyr
of the gallows.
Nevertheless, her book is enough, half a century on, to ensure
that Ruth Ellis will not be forgotten. On infrequent visits to
the Magdala, where the outside wall still bears the marks of a
murderers bullets, I always quietly drink to Ruth Ellis
in remembrance of a sad lost soul, wrongly convicted or
not.
|