UPDATED EVERY
FRIDAY

Last Update:
Friday 1st July, 2005
 
PUBLICATION
By PETER GRUNER
 
 
SECTIONS
 
NAVIGATION


With Google
 
 
 
Decision to end clamping was ‘too little, too late’

Halt to penalty for illegal parking is just spin claims MP


Cllr Steve Hitchins

THE decision to end clamping in Islington was welcomed this week, but campaigners against ‘draconian’ parking controls said it did not go far enough.
The council and its partner National Car Parks (NCP) is to stop clamping parked cars for minor infringements following widespread condemnation of the practice.
Council leader Steve Hitchins said: “We are listening to residents. They say ‘clamping-it just doesn’t make sense’ and we are responding by calling a halt to clamping.”
But Islington South and Finsbury MP Emily Thornberry said that ending clamping was a “small gesture” and didn’t mean an end to the war on the motorist.
She said: “If they were to announce that they are going to make less money out of motorists, then that would mean something,” she said.
“But I’m very cynical about this. I think it is all spin – because if they are not clamping cars they are probably towing them away.
“Parking controls should be making the lives of residents easier not more difficult.”
NCP Chief Executive Bob Macnaughton said. “There is no question that clamping can play an important role in deterring illegal parking, but it is right that the public has a say in how deterrents such as this are used.”
Islington was the last inner London borough to introduce clamping in 2003 and says it will be the first to remove it.
But Freedom Party campaigner Tim Newark said it was a pity that the decision came after such a bitter battle.
He said: “My party and Labour – which both stood against draconian parking – both polled more votes at the last by election than the Lib Dems and Greens combined. They are obviously now listening to us.”
He added that cars would still be towed away for over staying on a parking meter.
He said: “That can be worse than clamping because people don’t know where their cars have gone and it costs hundreds of pounds to get them back.”
He pointed out that Islington had refused a request by traders at Highbury Barn for a Saturday parking exemption.
He said: “Labour’s Cllr Teresa Debono and I had a meeting on Monday with the head of parking controls and explained that the restrictions were killing trade. We said, as Saturday was the busiest day, why couldn’t we have it free of controls? They said it wasn’t possible. So much for listening to the people.”
Peter Oborne, Highbury resident and political editor of the Spectatator magazine, said there was a long way to go before the council would end its ‘campaign of intimidation’.
He said: “Traffic wardens must stop hanging around schools in a predatory fashion when mothers drop off and collect children. They should be ordered to exercise much more discretion.”
Cars can still be clamped on private property, red routes and housing estates, as Islington Council does not manage clamping in these areas.
Reserve powers mean that mis-users of disabled badges, persistent evaders of parking fines and owners of untaxed vehicles, still risk being clamped.
   
   
 
All content © New Journal Enterprises, 2005