|
QUIT OVER SWIMMING DEBACLE
|
Heath chiefs face fury after
voting through charges
|

|
SWIMMERS are refusing to pay to use Hampstead Heaths
famous ponds until the Corporation of London comes clean over
its accounts.
And the Heaths management committee, chaired by Catherine
McGuinness and including Camden councillor John Thane, should
be forced to resign for gross incompetence, according to one prominent
swimmer.
Peter Cuming, former chairman of the United Swimmers Association,
told the New Journal: The committee has been unable to regulate
its funding and budget which has led us to this extraordinary
mess. They should resign immediately.
I will not be putting any money into the machines until
I am convinced that they are capable of balancing their budget.
In a victory for swimmers, cash-strapped bosses have now retreated
on proposals to close either one or all of the historic ponds,
which they had called an unsustainable drain on the
Heaths £5.5m budget.
But they have confirmed that self-policed ticket machines
that are similar to pay and display machines in car parks will
be introduced at the Mens, Ladies and Mixed Ponds by June
1.
It is not clear whether the machines will issue a ticket but they
will be able to record the time and date of each use and whether
it is a full price or concession.
According to a spokesman, this will ensure that all money collected
from the charging system can be recorded and accounted for.
Bosses are hoping that the voluntary charges £2 per
swim, a £1 concession and a £100-season ticket for
regular swimmers will bring in an estimated £80,000
towards the upkeep of the ponds.
But swimmers say that the system is unworkable and unfairly singles
them out for punishment. Many also fear that lack of cash from
the machines will eventually lead to the permanent closure of
the ponds.
Jane Shallice, chairwoman of the Kenwood Ladies Pond said:
What we are facing is the erosion of current facilities
over the next few years as they make more and more cutbacks. This
is a signal to swimmers.
She added: They have never proved that the swimming facilities
have contributed to the overspend. There are still major questions
on what the budget is being spent on.
Mary Cane, a regular swimmer at the Ladies Pond accused City bosses
of slowly privatising the Heath and said she would not pay until
she was convinced that the money was going somewhere useful.
She said: They have not listened to us at all. It is an
obscenity to install ticket machines by the ponds. The original
vision for the Heath was always that walking and swimming should
be free.
Robert Sutherland Smith, chairman of the United Swimmers Association
said: Their budgets are chaotic. If they were in the private
sector they would have been sacked years ago. There is no point
asking people for voluntary contributions unless they can demonstrate
they can manage their budget.
A Corporation spokesman said that there were additional costs
related to the ponds which swimmers did not currently pay for
while other facilities, like the tennis courts, were charged.
He added: There are three sports representatives on the
consultative committee who the swimmers can talk to if they are
unhappy with the management committee.
A consultative committee meeting to discuss the proposals will
take place on Monday, at 7pm, in the Lido Classroom, Gordon House
Road.
Swimmers are organising a special screening of Dangerous
When Wet, an Esther Williams film, at the Everyman Cinema
in Hampstead on March 5. Tickets cost £10/£5.
|